Davis Freeberg files this funny report about attending a public meeting in which Google and EarthLink hear from ordinary citizens and the tin-foil hat brigade in San Francisco: It's explicable that bureaucracy introduces delays, but uninformed crazy people may also extend the time-to-deployment for networks. I was warned by some SFer's months ago that despite predictions of smooth sailing for a muni-Wi-Fi network getting off the ground--and fast--that the political situation in San Francisco requires that the nuttiest have as much equity in the process as the sanest. Frisco! (They hate that name.)
Freeberg is most concerned about losing the free part of the Google/EarthLink deal, in which Google pays EarthLink in order to deliver free 300 Kbps service. EarthLink will wholesale and resell 1 Mbps access at what is predicted to be about $20 at retail. Google said they'll require accounts, which could be disposable but will still be mandatory, to use their free service.
In comments on Freeberg's post, legendary freedom fighter John Gilmore notes that the network won't be free to SF, which is providing valuable real-estate siting for antennas and other equipment. Gilmore is concerned that Google/EarthLink will be allowed to track users across the network with a high degree of granularity and "monopolize" the Wi-Fi airwaves. Thomas Hawk, who writes a blog that's always a good read, says privacy concerns are overblown given what's being provided in exchange for logging in.
My understanding re: the privacy concerns and location tracking (and this was from a conversation I had with a representative of the ACLU) is that its not a fear of Google serving ads based on your location and Google is now big brother but that it sets a precedent for other entities that may want to track a person.
Watchdog groups aren't as concerned about Google violating privacy just about them setting a legal precedent.
Who the hell cares about privacy. No one is forcing anyone to use the free wi-fi. I use the free wi-fi that Google offers up at Union Square all the time and the free wi-fi offered by TechConnect in the Ferry Building and could care less if Google knows what pages I go to.
I have to log in to both of those systems.
This is how 99% of real life people out there feel.
FREE WI-FI = good, very, very, very, good.
Privacy nuts can pay for their own system if this is important to the..
It's terrible that something that Mayor Newsom said would be here by year end now instead will be derailed while local nut jobs try to barter with the city for Google to have to use Google school buses to drive kids to and from the zoo.
Let's get free wi-fi in San Francisco now.