Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« I Remember Karlnet | Main | Central Park Remains Un-unwired? »

September 5, 2006

Metro Connect Consortium Picked for Wireless Silicon Valley

An errant press release seems to have slipped the news that Azulstar, Cisco, IBM, and Seakay's group--Metro Connect--will unwire Silicon Valley: The effort by the Joint Venture Silicon Valley Network to develop a Wireless Silicon Valley proposal and then find viable vendors appears to have reached the end. Seven companies and consortiums originally responded, and that number was winnowed to three. I predicted from the beginning that this four-firm consortium with two blue-chip tech firms involved would be the only one with the right combination of plans for deployment, technology, social purpose, experience, and financing. Cisco and IBM have a very large number of employees in the region under consideration; IBM specifically noted that they have 7,000 in the Bay Area, and is the second-largest San Jose employer.

The Metro Connect proposal will feature 1 Mbps free service and span 1,500 square miles, encompassing many different municipal entities. Fee-based services will include faster speeds, voice offerings, and video streaming. There are also plans to incorporate WiMax.

There are nearly four dozen cities, mostly in San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, and the counties themselves. Fremont and Newark in Alameda County and Santa Cruz in Santa Cruz County are also signed on. Fremont is one of the largest cities by area in California at 92 square miles, just by the way, so it's a significant addition. Other cities may join later. Yesterday, Los Altos and Cupertino said they would join the project.

The participation by cities in this proposal is, however, a bit complicated. San Mateo County's telecom authority (SAMCAT) issued the RFP and has Joint Powers Authority for 18 of the 35 original cities signed on, and there's an intent to create model agreements that each city could then sign off on. However, the addendum to the RFP, issued in June, notes on page 7 that "each city will independently ratify the winning vendor's proposal for their geography and jurisdiction." Also, antenna attachment agreements aren't included as part of the RFP. And the winning vendor needs to work with existing WISPs, not just displace them.

This may be rather complicated, but given the way this was structured, I suspect that most of the approval process will go swimmingly and some percentage of cities will have specific needs, concerns, or objections. The old 80-20 rule, or perhaps 95-5. The details will emerge over what I expect is several months.

While Silicon Valley is often thought of as a high-tech paradise, development centers along highway corridors and city centers. There are plenty of less-populated, less-served, and once-considered-rural areas in this giant region.