Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« 802.1X for the Smaller Office | Main | DD-WRT Adds Sputnik Agent »

April 5, 2006

Google, EarthLink Top SF Pick

Google and EarthLink were identified as the top candidate to build San Francisco's citywide network at their own expense: This allows the city to start negotiating with the two firms on details. Beware timetables. Philadelphia and EarthLink have spent months negotiating, and then the mayor's office apparently dumped hundreds of pages of detail about five city contracts and a sixth private one on city council members' desks hoping for a rubber stamp. Those contracts are not yet approved by the council.

The AP reports that Google is clearly stating they have no plans beyond SF and Mountain View, which has over 300 access points installed already and is in testing mode. Google's Chris Sacca, one of the municipal networking managers, said at David Isenberg's Freedom to Connect (F2C) conference this week that Google will act like a tenant on EarthLink's network, buying access from them to give away at 300 Kbps, according to Esme Vos.

1 TrackBack

[Summary]Here's an interesting discussion in regards to the long-term strategic direction of Google, based ... Read More

1 Comment

There are more than privacy issues to be concerned when looking at the disturbing Muni WiFi model deal put together in San Francisco by Google and Earthlink. A SF muni wireless advocacy group, Webnetic, saw the deal becoming more business than citizen friendly right from the start. There are many holes in the SF RFP and a disturbing absence of municipal responsibility and participation in the network. I am tired of seeing lobbyist supported state laws and now business special interests being the guiding principals behind the building of our municipal wireless broadband networks. I understand that free is always the easiest way out, especially when a big search and advertising company is based in your region. My concern with the SF RFP is the lack of attention to network designs addressing the critical needs of indestructible interoperable municipal networks serving both the public and public safety personal in the SF region.

Municipals should not be asking the blessing of their state governments or RFP respondents for the deployment of safety first muni wireless networks. These requirements are the obligation of every city in the nation and frankly should be mandated in all vendor RFPs. The critical need of survivable and interoperable public safety wireless networks have been repeatedly shown in every major recent disaster in our nation. All cities have the obligation to protect their employees and citizens and are legally obligated to use critical tools to support these safety requirements. The only way to affordably and rapidly deploy these crucial safety first WiFi networks in our communities is to partner both the public/private sector and create wireless services that serve both sectors.

We forget so fast. Wasn't fixing our public safety's lack of interoperability and the need in creating survivable wireless networks designs the reason munis were getting into the broadband wireless business in the first place? Don't get me wrong, I am glad at least one major city is moving forward with a muni WiFi deployment. Just let's not think that the Google/Earthlink deal is the end all national model of serving all the community WiFi needs.