Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« Metro Round-Up: Flounder for Breakfast; SF's Bottoms-Up Network; Long Island Select Provider; Short Delays in Minneapolis, St. Louis Park | Main | Open Devices, Not Just Handsets in Swath of 700 MHz »

August 16, 2007

Metro Round-Up: More on Long Island-Fi; WSJ Plays Muni-Fi Kazoo, Too

The Long Island network deal raises a few eyebrows: The New York Times sticks "newcomer" right in the headline of their story about Suffolk County and Nassau County's selection of e-Path Communications to build the largest currently proposed single-contract network. The counties chose e-Path and its partners Cisco and KeySpan because the municipal entities didn't have to cross the consortium's hands with filthy lucre. Here's the money graf from the article:

"Some Wi-Fi systems elsewhere have fallen short in their expected advertising revenue, and [Suffolk County executive Steve] Levy acknowledged that it remains to be seen if e-Path’s innovative financial plan will succeed. 'Let's see how this works,' he said." Yeah. That's how I plan a reportedly $150m, 700 sq mi network, too.

(Wireless Silicon Valley's 1,500 sq mi requires 40-odd individual contracts with cities and counties; Houston's contract with EarthLink covers 600 sq mi. A network in Eastern Oregon is larger and growing, but covers a population that numbers a fraction of Long Island's two counties involved in this deal.)

Newsday follows up on their brief account yesterday of the deal by surveying how other networks are faring, and whether the model proposed by e-Path et al can work. I'm quoted saying, no, it can't. More significantly, the reporter spoke with Chuck Haas, CEO of MetroFi, which was one of the bidders on the Long Island network. "That company bid on the Long Island project, including upfront costs in its plan, an expense county executives sought to avoid. But Haas said lack of upfront money makes the business model unsustainable."

It's critical to recall, too, that "upfront money" should really be described as "fees currently paid to a variety of telecom and data providers, mostly incumbent monopolies, that would be transferred to a new wireless operator as the network achieves benchmarks of performance." There is plenty of money to be moved over or saved from city telecom budgets for dedicated wired lines, among other areas, where the service commitment to a MetroFi or EarthLink would involve no incremental increase in expense, or perhaps a one-time increase followed by a decline.

Joining in on the fun of describing the change in the muni-Fi market, the Wall Street Journal provides its take: This article details the cost overruns, delays, and business model problems with many networks that are being and are not being built. Note that everyone quoted is now in agreement that cities need to step up to the plate and agree to purchase services to have their networks built. That used to be a narrowly held opinion as recently as early this year. As reality has set in, so, too, has the attitude changed. One note about the article, though: It repeats the common fallacy that "Initially, cities funded their projects out of their own budgets." Only certain smaller cities chose that funding route. Some larger towns planned to fund their networks that way. But I know of no deployment of any scale that didn't involve a vendor bearing all the cost. Networks in Chaska, Minn., Lompoc, Calif., and St. Cloud, Flor., were built at city expense; the former two as for-fee networks, and the latter as a free one. Corpus Christi, Tex., built the largest city network I'm aware of, but for municipal purposes, selling it to EarthLink when the transition to a for-fee public access network came into view.

What about the equipment vendors? It's been a while since I spoke to Tropos, BelAir, Strix, Motorola, Cisco, and SkyPilot about their metro-scale gear, because the focus of the industry (and this site along with it) moved to deployments and applications rather than the hardware. How does your business model change, when networks that would require tens of thousands of nodes are put on hold? I expect we'll see the answer to that question by year's end. One part of the answer is that the four startups in the list above may have promoted themselves as municipal solutions, but are selling products worldwide and for corporate campuses and private purposes. I expect we'll also find none of these firms were silly enough to put all their eggs in one basket.