Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« Anchorage, Alas., Cancels Deal over Anchor Tenancy | Main | Wee-Fi: iPhones Run Amuck on Duke Network, Memorial Network-Fi »

July 17, 2007

After the Build-It-Free Flood, the Drought

As previously noted and predicted in this space, the flood of offers by service providers to build out city-wide networks on their own dime with no service commitments is over: Clovis, Calif., is the latest case in point. The city found after performing quite a bit of analysis that they couldn't find a business model that would work, and costs were too high to hire a firm. This article doesn't note whether the costs are upfront but could be conserved through savings in telecom fees, like reducing leased lines or replacing cell data network subscriptions.

Clovis's information systems manager told the Sacramento Bee: "Nine months ago, companies were lining up at the door saying they wanted to do it for free." This comment has been echoed across the country. With EarthLink's at least temporary abeyance of new bids, with MetroFi having a new model (and its hands full), and Kite not appearing to participate in new bidding that I'm aware of outside the Southwest, the most prominent early firms in the space have checked out for smaller towns, at the very least.

The manager, Jesse Velez, also noted that a system installed today could be obsolete in a couple of years. I might normally ridicule that statement, because that's universally true, except that metro-scale systems are at a unique juncture. In two years, all equipment vendors will have multiple-antenna (MIMO) systems, with 802.11n as an option for improving range and bandwidth. Mobile WiMax will either be succeeding or crashing in the marketplace.

It's very reasonable for a city or town to say today, "Let's wait." There's going to be a shakeout in the provider market in the next three to six months. I also suspect many of the awarded bids and bids-in-progress for smaller towns fall apart--we've seen the leading edge in the last few weeks of that. And 802.11n is barreling down the road with interim certification for the draft and a final version due next spring. It's time to keep experimenting with parks, downtowns, and business districts, but the time doesn't seem ripe to launch major new efforts.

3 Comments

As a resident of Corpus Christi, I would say thus far EarthLink is doing a miserable job. They took over the city network last year and launched the service several months ago. To this day I have seen no effort to promote it. I would say virtually no one is aware of the service and the small number that used it has since quit after the free period ended.

This raises serious questions for me and I'm sure others. What exactly is going on at EarthLink that they wouldn't want to advertise their service to the public? It is almost as if they don't want people to sign up. Problems anyone?

Wi-Fi works well at the grass roots level. Are there widespread problems with wireless home networking? Don't think so.

When the mindset, and the business model, is modified to include local businesses and residences in the provision of Wi-Fi service, we'll see cities making progress.

But right now, everyone is thinking so 'Top Down', they don't realize the obvious answer.

Good review Glenn. You and Craig Settles have been consistent with your position that someone will need to pay for these services-effectively taking the Politics out of the equation.
Unfortunately some of the first generation Mesh Vendors and providers used this ploy to capture the business and equally frustrating is the fact that many of these networks will struggle and fail because of the technologies being deploy and not just because they were offered free.

I would add that there are some Mesh Vendors delivering what I would consider Carrier Grade Mesh products (Strix and BelAir). Both are offering 3 & 4 Radio Mesh systems today that can support the Access and Backhaul bandwidth required today and near term.

With 802.11n we will first see it delivered as a backhaul radio (5Ghz) delivering 100+Mbps between Nodes and extended range. Second Intel will Commit to build and deploy a dual radio 802.11n based product (2.4 &5Ghz)for their Centrino (eliminating the a/b/g) along with their WiMAX 802.16e Mobile)chips. This should cover the market until 700Mhz becomes available (late 2009-10)in the gateway backhaul side.
a