Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« T-Mobile Rolls Out 802.1X Nationwide | Main | Broadcom to Acquire Agere? »

October 5, 2004

Hotspot Operators Face New Patent Fee Demand

A patent-buying firm has told hotspot operators that royalties are due for gateway page redirection: Last week, hotspot operators told Wi-Fi Networking News, they began receiving hefty packets from Acacia Technologies describing the company's patent rights that it contends cover gateway page redirection used by many hotspot operators. (T-Mobile's new 802.1X system will not use redirection at all.) Acacia will require royalties to continue using the technology.

Redirection involves the access point or back-end system capturing any Web page request from an unauthenticated user on the network and redirecting them to a page that contains login or usage information. After successfully logging in, the user is then passed on to their original page or a hotspot information page.

Acacia Technologies, a company that is in the business of purchasing and enforcing patents, bought patent number 6,226,677 from LodgeNet. The patent covers redirection. Hotspot operators that received letters have been asked to pay $1,000 per year (editor's note: an earlier version incorrectly stated that $1,000 would be due per quarter) for up to 3,500 redirected connections. Companies that rack up more than 3,500 redirections per year pay between 5 cents and 15 cents per redirect additionally.

Acacia wouldn't say how many letters it had sent out so far "but anybody who operates a hotspot with redirection can assume they'll hear from us," said Rob Berman, executive vice president of business development and general counsel for Acacia Technologies. Matrix Networks is among three hotspot operators that have contacted Wi-Fi Networking News regarding the letters; the others wished to remain anonymous. Wayport has not received a letter and T-Mobile has not yet responded to our query.

In January, Nomadix received a patent that includes some redirect techniques. "It is our belief that our patent predates" the Nomadix patent, Berman said. The Nomadix patent was filed December 8, 1999 and the Acacia patent was filed January 15, 1999.

Nomadix was not available for comment.

Acacia examined a variety of factors including the strength of the patent and profit margins of hotspot operators to set the licensing fee. "We think we set the royalties at a low enough level where it shouldn't have any affect on the market," said Berman. "These royalties should not affect anybody's business in a negative way."

Letter recipients will have 30 days to study the documents and ask questions. After that, Acacia will contact them again. "Ultimately if people opt not to license the patent, if they can't show us that they're not infringing, then that could result in patent infringement litigation. It's not our first choice but sometimes that becomes necessary. We have $30 million in the bank and we have the resources to enforce the patent as necessary," Berman said.

Those who choose to license earlier get a better deal, he said. Acacia is waiving past infringement initially but over time will stop doing that and will also raise royalties. "Those who license earlier on get the best deals," Berman said.

Not everyone believes the patent is valid. Jim Thompson, formerly the CTO of Wayport and currently with NetGate, weighed in on the topic on the Bay Area Wireless Users Group community site. Thompson says that Wayport was doing redirect before either the Nomadix or Acacia patents were filed. That could be grounds for reversing the patent, he said.

Acacia chose to approach operators that use products that do redirect rather than offering licenses to manufacturers because it can potentially earn more money from operators. "The user has recurring revenue, the manufacturer is a one-time sale," said Berman.

Nigel Ballard, director of wireless for Matrix Networks, has contacted Nomadix for advice on how to proceed since he received a package from Acacia. Matrix recently bought 37 Nomadix boxes and has others installed at hotels. Matrix sells systems to hotels so Matrix wouldn't be required to pay royalties to Acacia but its customers would. "If it comes down to it, do we have to go to Hilton and say, 'that box we sold you in good faith, apparently there's a patent infringement'? I don't want to have to do that," Ballard said.

Ballard is also involved with Portland's Personal Telco project and wonders if the group, which uses the open source NoCatAuth that has redirect built in, will also receive a letter. Berman said Acacia is looking into the community groups but hasn't made a determination about approaching them.

Update: Michael Oh of NewburyOpen.Net wrote in to note that he had also received a packet from Acacia relating to his free, business-supported Wi-Fi networking effort in Boston on Newbury Street. "Ironically, we don't use home page redirection on our public network, so they're obviously not doing their research," Oh said via email.

2 TrackBacks

It has been a busy week for the patent lawyers out there who are trying to extort money for what they claim is an invention, but is in reality only another arrangement of binary bits in the memory of a computer. Top of the list, at least in terms of... Read More

Yesterday, at the annual face-to-face meeting of the EDUCAUSE CIO Constituent Group, Jason Schultz of the

Read More