Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« Wi-Fi Networking News's New Look | Main | Nortel Challenges Startups »

November 1, 2003

The State of 802.1X in the Client

802.1X poised to replace the wireless-outside-the-firewall philosophy, if only clients existed: As WPA has started to percolate slowly, so slowly, into Wi-Fi equipment, I've seen the simultaneous rise of interest in 802.1X, an authentication method in which WEP or WPA keys can be assigned through a three-role authentication process. (I wrote about this a bit a few days ago specifically in reference to Microsoft's upcoming wireless provisioning service and T-Mobile's also upcoming support of 802.1X.)

In brief: a client or supplicant connects to an access point or authenticator which passes credentials to an authentication server. Once the credentials have been confirmed, the authenticator hands back a unique WEP or WPA key, which can be replaced reguarly and automatically, and opens access to the supplicant to the rest of the network.

802.1X requires support in the client via the operating system or a third-party software application; in the access point, through the ability to accept EAP (extensible authentication protocol) messages and hand them off to a RADIUS or other authentication server defined in some area of the access point's configuration; and an authentication server that can respond with the right information to initiate the keying process after credentials are accepted.

None of these requirements is a high bar. Windows XP has shipped with an 802.1X client for some time, although it only supports a couple of flavors of secured EAP, in which the credential exchange is encrypted within tunnels. And virtually all mainstream RADIUS and similar servers are now equipped to talk 802.1X/EAP using various secured EAP methods.

The client is the weak point, because until last week, only Windows XP had a built-in 802.1X client. Mac OS X 10.3 (Panther) now includes 802.1X support, and they feature all of the EAP types, including PEAP, LEAP, EAP-TLS, EAP-TTLS, and MD5. Some of those are deprecated. (Because it's a Mac, if you're using a certificate-based EAP method, like EAP-TLS, you just drag a certificate from email into the Keychain program, and that's that.)

Other platforms and other versions of operating systems aren't out of luck because they can turn to Meetinghouse, which supports flavors of Windows and Mac OS X (before 10.3), as well as Linux 2.4 and Solaris. But there wasn't much motivation to buy 802.1X clients until the whole chain was available.

WPA has driven this process faster, it seems to me, because WPA solves the key-changing problem. With WEP, some scientists have told me that you've have to change the key every 300 packets to be sure that intercepted data couldn't be decrypted. That's a high bar. With WPA, an 802.1X system could change keys every few minutes -- or weeks or years potentially -- without any reduction in the level of security even with the TKIP key that's available as part of the WPA standard.

Another element driving 802.1X adoption is that it reduces VPN costs. If you're using a wireless-outside-the-firewall approach that requires a VPN client on the local network to tunnel through, you can completely eliminate the VPN client and per-seat server costs. For roaming users, you still need VPN connections, but local VPN systems that can support megabyte-per-second connections are quite expensive, where 802.1X can piggyback on existing RADIUS installations.

Finally, because 802.1X communicates between the authenticator (switch or access point) and authentication service using yet another standard -- EAP over LAN or WLAN (EAPOL or EAPOW) -- the authentication server can be remotely located on a local network or elsewhere on the Internet.

Follow this through, and you can see that with widely distributed client software that supports all EAP types, even small offices and hotspots could provide effective local link security by outsourcing the authentication server portion. One company, Wireless Security Corporation, is already offering this service -- and more will certainly follow.

What's the executive summary, here at the end? No more local VPNs. WPA is robust, trusted encryption. 802.1X clients should be purchased and installed on all wireless computers.