Intel now says early 2004 for 802.11g: Earlier, the company had hoped to ship dual a/b chips by mid-year and 802.11g by sometime next year, but has delayed the a/b til late 2003, and moved up 802.11g.
Receive new posts as email.
Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
28 | 29 | 30 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« FCC Considers More 5 GHz Spectrum | Main | SBC Gets Hot »
Intel now says early 2004 for 802.11g: Earlier, the company had hoped to ship dual a/b chips by mid-year and 802.11g by sometime next year, but has delayed the a/b til late 2003, and moved up 802.11g.
The market seems hotter about 802.11g... but this truly free for all 2.4GHz band is too crowded already! The a standard using 5GHz dedicated to telecom use seems like a much better fit.
I guess we're seeing the Beta vs. VHS batter again where a better technology will not take off because of a better marketing machine at a few big companies.
S