Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« In the Media | Main | Announcement Mailing List »

April 8, 2001

HomeRF, HomeRF off the Radio Range

Intel has opted for the 802.11b wireless short-range networking standard in their next generation AnyPoint wireless-LAN hardware. This decision changed their course from a plan to include the next generation version of HomeRF, a related standard, in the home environment. It may mark a turning point in HomeRF and 802.11b adoption. (Read the story at EETimes.com.)

When I was researching a huge New York Times piece about wireless networks for public use in places like airports and coffee shops (archived here), I heard from many sources that HomeRF was not going to be an ultimately successful player. Of course, most of these sources were either manufacturing 802.11b equipment, or deploying it. So I had to take it with a grain of salt, and that scepticism didn't enter into the final piece.

But I'll admit that while I try to view the field without bias, it was clear that Proxim was driving the HomeRF standard, and 802.11b - not least because it was an IEEE promulgated specification - had broad industry support. No one has to drive 802.11b because so many companies were involved in a consensus-based process to build the standard. It's also an evolution of a standard that's been under development for several years.

HomeRF, on the other hand, needed an advocate in the form of Proxim, the company that came up with the basics. Now, most sources I spoke to agreed that there was a niche home-networking purpose for HomeRF, because HomeRF has a guaranteed "schedule" that allows voice conversations and data to intermingle without losing voice quality. 802.11b lacks this feature, requiring underlying applications to handle their own scheduling. This could result in dropouts and lags.

But it seems to me that the 802.11b juggernaut had already rolled over HomeRF, partly because HomeRF wasn't allowed to work at the same high speeds as 802.11b until approval from the FCC last August. 802.11b has been able to run at 11 Mbps (raw speed; actual data transfer without overhead is about 7 Mbps) since 1999. HomeRF products that can run at its newly approved 10 Mbps flavor won't be available in lots of devices until summer. (They can also run at 22 Mbps in a new specification using the same frequency rules, but that's not going to be in shipping equipment for at least another year.)

According to the EE Times story, this delay is one factor that drove Intel to drop HomeRF 2.0 (the 10 Mbps standard) in their AnyPoint devices. Another was the fast and extensive penetration of 802.11b devices in the home - a charge led by a number of vendors now with their $300 or less home gateways. (See related cheap gateways article.)

HomeRF isn't yet out of the picture, and Motorola and Siemens both have serious commitments to ship HomeRF equipment in set-top cable boxes, home gateways, and telephone receivers. We'll see what's up by summer.