Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
| 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 |
| 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 |
| 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Skyhook Not Violating Your Privacy, Stealing Sheep, Eating Your Young | Main | Wee-Fi: Short Items for Thursday, March 22 »
USA Today is reporting that FCC chair Kevin Martin won’t pursue dropping an in-flight cell phone use ban: The FAA has one set of airworthiness objections that have been working their way through technical advisory committees; the FCC has another set, related to use of the spectrum in air and, frankly, the social issues. The thousands of comments they received on lifting the ban made for amusing reading: in sum, lord no! The paper reports that most of the FCC commissioners support Martin’s position. (USA Today got the lead from Communications Daily, they note.)
Aircell’s chief Jack Blumenstein is quoted in this article as expressing little concern; Aircell made no bones over the last couple of years that their business was broadband, not mobile phones—unless carriers and passengers wanted it. Major carriers I spoke to last fall, including United and Delta, said their passengers had no interest in it and thus neither did they.
Aircell is in an advantageous situation, because they purchased enough bandwidth at a decent price in the air-to-ground spectrum auction last summer to provide broadband service at a fee that should result in good uptake. The finances are there for that to work. They don’t need mobile calling to make their business work.
In Europe and Asia, there’s been no similar comprehensive air-to-ground auctions that I’m aware of that would allow an overland offering, and in-flight telecom is limited to expensive satellite service. OnAir’s rollout of mobile calling in Europe—at about $2.50 per minute—should see its first connected aircraft any day now. Satellite bandwidth with the system that OnAir, Aeromobile, and others have committed to so far is financially untenable for mass-market in-flight broadband.
Posted by Glennf at March 21, 2007 9:01 PM
Categories: Air Travel, Regulation
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/4464