Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Spotty Coverage Afflicts Business Travelers | Main | CLECs' Revenge: McDowell Confirms Recusal »
The land of up to three Wi-Fi networks is live with EarthLink: The city may eventually have coverage from MetroFi, EarthLink, and the Wireless Silicon Valley project. EarthLink is offering 30 days of free use starting today to promote the 10-square-mile network. Thereafter, service runs $4 for an hour, $16 for a three-day pass, or $22 per month from EarthLink. The company will resell access to other providers. Their press release cites PeoplePC as a third-aprty reseller, but that firm is owned by EarthLink.
Posted by Glennf at December 19, 2006 11:19 AM
Categories: Metro-Scale Networks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/4268
As a Cupertino resident who tried hard to utilze the MetroFi solution, I can state that I gave up due to the difficulty of getting the solution to operate reliably.
In addition, their advertising banner delivery is obnoxious and seriously interfers with normal web browsing, retrieves new ads at random times and appears to consume significant bandwidth. My intent had been to verify system operation and then switch to their pay for use offering.
Posted by: dwm at December 20, 2006 6:26 PM
Wondering how metrofi is faring with their ad model..Their Cupertino/Santa Clara/SJ locations have been running for a while now on the ad model, so performance stats on those might be an interesting read.
Glenn, I remember a post from you a while back where you were optimistic about the free service + banner ad model..wanted to see if the stats would vindicate such a scenario
[Editor's note: MetroFi is privately held and notoriously close to the vest with numbers. The only way we may find out if their model works is: a. they file to sell stock to the public; b. their founders buy solid gold houses; c. they are acquired in a weird little deal in which the price isn't disclosed, and a lot of the company leaves or is laid off; d. they go bankrupt. --gf]
Posted by: Rajeev at December 19, 2006 5:21 PM