Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Hype Patrol in Muni-Fi | Main | Connexion May Shut Down, Wall St Journal Reports »
For those who claim that Our Google Overlords, praised be their names, have plans to blanket the earth in Wi-Fi in exchange for precious ad revenue, think again: A Google exec said the Mountain View network wouldn’t have ads on it. They’ve said before that the San Francisco network likely wouldn’t initially have ads, either.
Interesting side note that Google is working with amateur radio operators or hams. Hams have some licensed use of part of the 2.4 GHz range, although that’s rarely come up as a conflict. It’s obviously in higher use in Mountain View or the issue wouldn’t have been raised.
(Oh, and the group who are those who claim…I’m talking about you, Om.)
Posted by Glennf at June 21, 2006 8:13 PM
Categories: Metro-Scale Networks
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/3797