Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Concise In-Flight Spectrum Roadmap | Main | Pittsburgh Newspaper Says Muni-Authorized Wi-Fi Akin to Ownership »
eWeek writes that Microsoft has been tardy in adding WPA2 support: The company sits on the board of the Wi-Fi Alliance, and yet has seemed relatively indifferent to corporate and government interests in having the strongest form of Wi-Fi link layer security available across its platforms and management systems. Andrew Garcia notes that Windows 2003 still doesn’t offer WPA2 support—it will arrive with Service Pack 2—and that the early look at it within Longhorn Server shows it needs more work.
Garcia notes that system managers can’t use the Group Policy tool to control WPA2 authentication settings for Windows XP Service Pack 2 clients that have added WPA2 support. XP SP2 allows WPA2 as an optional upgrade, too.
The writer takes Microsoft to task for continuing to support just PEAP, its preferred flavor for 802.1X authentication. He notes that it would be nice to see EAP-TTLS, PEAP/EAP-GTC, and EAP-SIM, authentication flavors supported through an optional certification process at the Wi-Fi Alliance.
At one point, I thought Microsoft chose PEAPv0 as a defensive measure and a way to ensure use of their server software. But since most clients and servers now support most secured EAP methods, it’s a little silly for Microsoft to stick to one option: there’s no advantage for them, and it restricts customer choice.
Posted by Glennf at June 12, 2006 11:01 AM
Categories: Security
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/3769