Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« 802.11n Proposal Confirmed; Broadcom, Marvell Have Chips | Main | The Power of Local in the Wireless LAN »
A large study in the UK finds no elevated risk of a common brain tumor from cell phone use: In a retrospective study in which researchers from several institutions in England interviewed nearly 3,000 people, they found that cell phone use does not appear to bring an elevated risk of brain tumors. 966 people in the group had glioma; 1,716 did not. Respondents were queried about cell phone use over the last 10 years.
Researchers found that in the group with glioma, there was an elevated risk of their tumors appearing on the side of the head which the interview subject said they most frequently used their cell phone. But they found an equivalent decreased risk on the other side of the head, leading to the conclusion of reporting bias: people knew which side their tumor was on.
Because many glioma sufferers perish quickly, a group quoted in this BBC article note that there may be a bias toward longer-surviving cancer sufferers. All parties agree more research is needed, especially on long-term use of cell phones. But this study confirms a number of others in recent years that, while they cannot show there is no risk, have demonstrated no increased risk.
Posted by Glennf at January 20, 2006 10:14 AM
Categories: Health