Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate WNN sites

Single feed for all sites

Syndicate this site

RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search

Google

Web this site

January 2007
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Deals Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media IPTV Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal Public Safety
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G UMTS Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

Wi-Fi Protected Setup Details Announced
Details on San Francisco/EarthLink Deal
San Francisco Reaches Deal with EarthLink, Google
Solid Coverage in Time of Muni Wi-Fi
NextWave Buys Go Networks
Surf, Sand, and Wi-Fi
Bluetooth Has Patent Woes
San Francisco! Slowly I Turned...Step by Step...Inch by Inch...
EarthLink CEO Garry Betty Dies
Rent-A-Cellular-Bridge from Avis

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« Boingo Expands in Japan | Main | The Remarkable Disappearance of JetConnect »

October 3, 2005

EarthLink Scores First Municipal Win

By Glenn Fleishman

Philadelphia picks EarthLink to build its wireless network: The 11-year-old firm will use Tropos equipment to build a citywide mesh of Wi-Fi. The word on the street from several sources is that EarthLink will make aggressive bids for many of the major RFPs out there; they’re one of the bidders for San Francisco’s network. At Esme Vos’s Muniwireless conference last week, EarthLink announced the formation of a municipal networking division.

This is a unique moment in the history of EarthLink. To my knowledge, the company has owned effectively no substantial infrastructure in its history. It was founded on buying modem time from shared pools. It has resold DSL and Wi-Fi service maintained and operated by others. This move into municipal infrastructure certainly gives them a chance to derive revenue other than from the shrinking dial-up user base and the ludicrously over- and underregulated DSL market.

The next step in Philadelphia’s process, ostensibly, is raising the money. Wireless Philadelphia, a non-profit, is supposed to raise funds through grants and loans to pay EarthLink to build the network out. More recent reporting suggested bonds might be involved, even though those seemed specifically ruled out in earlier reports of early-stage financing. The project’s plan calls for operating revenue to provide any cash flow to fund additional budgeted infrastructure without returning to outside sources for money. A substantial amount of this operating revenue should come from Philadelphia, which has pledged its telecommunications business to Wireless Philadelphia.

Reports this morning say that EarthLink will bear the entire cost of building the network. This will take the wind out of the sail of critics who have claimed consistently that taxpayers would be on the hook at some point: either in using bonding ability, in failing and requiring taxpayer bailout out, or in failing and requiring Philadelphia to renegotiate a telecom deal with someone else.

EarthLink will offer direct service, but also resell wholesale access. The non-profit, the administrator of the network, will receive a cut of the service fees and use that to fund digital divide initiatives, according to a source involved in network planning. The city will not have direct access to these funds.

EarthLink’s willingness to pony up real cash coupled with San Francisco receiving 24 bids to build a network at the bidders’ own expense and offer low rates for service also explodes the notion that there’s no profit—even indirectly—in municipal networks.

This also means that cities on the fence about putting out a bid for companies to bear full expense are probably all going slightly ape at the moment: if the feeding frenzy is on, we know that citie will try to cash in while the getting is good. If they write smart contracts, they can own infrastructure (not a bankruptcy court) if endeavors go south.

More detail: EarthLink PR sent me their press release which notes that they will resell access on a wholesale basis both to other ISPs, already noted, but also to hotspot operators. There’s a key difference, because hotspot operators will have sporadic users, not regular ones, who want a single login to use the network.

EarthLink will also offer daily and weekly rates for access, and free service in some parks and public spaces. Small businesses will be able to buy T-1 replacement service. This is a fascinating part of municipal networking as EarthLink can choose to put in much higher levels of coverage in business districts and use point-to-point or point-to-multipoint to target businesses with a guaranteed QoS.

Posted by Glennf at October 3, 2005 10:18 PM

Categories: Municipal

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:

Comments

Wait... So now were going from "FREE" City Wide Wireless Network to a pay system from Earthlink? You have got to be kidding me!

[Editor's note: It was never actually pitched by the city as free. Early, accidental and purposely inaccurate reporting and reports said the city would be giving service away for free. If you look at the earliest interviews and documents produced, the goal was always stated as offering below-market rates for broadband, but broadband speeds below what DSL and cable services provide. Coupled with that would be free or subsidized access for folks below a certain income level and at community centers and parks.--gf]

Posted by: Anonymous at October 6, 2005 8:25 PM

Post a comment




Remember Me?