Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Texas City Hires Network Builder for Wi-Fi | Main | MCI's Hotspot Network »
Meru claims it’s more compliant than compliant: Meru Networks issued a very odd press release that stated that although they were already meeting Wi-Fi Alliance certification standards, they resubmitted their gear for “more rigorous tests than are used on its competitors.”
But the outcome is that Meru is…”completely compliant.”
There’s back story here that wasn’t exposed in the release. It sounds like someone has been talking smack about Meru. And now they are compliant, even though before they were…compliant. Sure, that takes the confusion out of the marketplace.
Posted by Glennf at March 23, 2005 6:39 AM
Categories: Enterprise
TrackBack URL for this entry:
I think that the mudslinging is coming from the usual suspects within the WiFi arena. I would have point the finger at Ciscospace...Airespace.
Nice try but I think they wasted many resources and time in trying to discredit Meru. This only further damages Ciscospace's credibility in the marketplace.
Best of luck to Meru, seems like they offer the best architecture for VoWLAN
Posted by: ghost1 at March 23, 2005 1:33 PM