Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Roaming Issues Writ Small in Waikiki | Main | Qualcomm Joins Popular 802.11n Task Group Proposal »
Cell subscribers sue Verizon Wireless for disabling Bluetooth file transfer: There was word all over the Net that this was brewing, and this report says the suit was filed. Verizon Wireless disabled Bluetooth file transfer (and possibly other features) on its Motorola v710 phone. The suit alleges, as some online mobile folks have said since this came to light, that Verizon disabled the feature to force its subscribers to transfer photos only through its higher-priced data service offerings.
Bluetooth operates at about 700 Kbps of real throughput; Verizon’s EVDO network, as cool as it is, can only handle 50 to 100 Kbps upload speeds; slower where there’s only 1xRTT available, too. To transfer photos to your computer, you’d need to subscribe to a Verizon data plan and photo plan, transfer the photos, and then download them. So it’s a three machine process.
The suit may hinge over whether Verizon Wireless misled customers, which it appears prima facie that they did not. As a Motorola spokesperson said, quite amusingly to my ear, “Nobody in the industry has ever said that Bluetooth would always be cost free. It will vary from operator to operator.”
It’s amusing because it implies that files stored on your phone don’t belong to you. It’s akin to the increasingly common argument made by companies that design devices to play or store media that you purchase or create that the content that you own or have rights to use doesn’t really belong to you. What next? Will Verizon Wireless invoke the DMCA in its defense? (Don’t ask me how, but remember Lexmark and their DMCA printer cartridge suit.)
Posted by Glennf at January 16, 2005 7:38 PM
Categories: Bluetooth, Cellular, Legal
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/2955
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Bluetooth Disabled? Sue!:
» Verison SezNo to Bluetooth from Craig Cline's Blog
Verizon is just being greedy idiots. [Read More]
Tracked on January 16, 2005 7:56 PM
» Verizon is just being greedy from Craig Cline's News & Views
Verizon is just being greedy idiots. The market won't stand for it. many other carriers don't proscribe their subscribers from using Bluetooth or most other features. Hey, what's next? a click charge for each photo taken ona phone? Bluetoot... [Read More]
Tracked on January 16, 2005 7:57 PM
» Verizon is just being greedy from Craig Cline's News & Views
Verizon is just being greedy idiots. The market won't stand for it. many other carriers don't proscribe their subscribers from using Bluetooth or most other features. Hey, what's next? a click charge for each photo taken ona phone? Bluetoot... [Read More]
Tracked on January 16, 2005 7:58 PM
» Verizon is just being greedy from Craig Cline's News & Views
Verizon is just being greedy idiots. The market won't stand for it. many other carriers don't proscribe their subscribers from using Bluetooth or most other features. Hey, what's next? a click charge for each photo taken ona phone? Bluetoot... [Read More]
Tracked on January 16, 2005 8:02 PM
» All your phonecam pics are belong to Verizon from Boing Boing
Tireless wireless pundit Glenn Fleishman says: Verizon Wireless is being sued because they disabled access to Bluetooth file transfers on their version of the Motorola v710. Mind you, I'm not sure they ever promised that Bluetooth file transfer would b... [Read More]
Tracked on January 17, 2005 5:55 AM
» All your phonecam pics are belong to Verizon from Boing Boing
Tireless wireless pundit Glenn Fleishman says: Verizon Wireless is being sued because they disabled access to Bluetooth file transfers on their version of the Motorola v710. Mind you, I'm not sure they ever promised that Bluetooth file transfer would b... [Read More]
Tracked on January 17, 2005 5:59 AM
» We never stop working for you. from larry borsato
Some Verizon customers are suing the company because they have disabled Bluetooth on its Motorola v710 phone. The current argument is that the suit may have no basis, as Verizon did not mislead customers. However, today on their website I... [Read More]
Tracked on January 17, 2005 12:04 PM
» Self-Serve Equals "Do My Work For Me!" from Nostalgic Rumblings
Or why I'm going to be dumping Verizon Wireless after they asked me to do their clerical work for them. [Read More]
Tracked on January 17, 2005 3:08 PM
» All your phonecam pics are belong to Verizon from Boing Boing
Tireless wireless pundit Glenn Fleishman says: Verizon Wireless is being sued because they disabled access to Bluetooth file transfers on their version of the Motorola v710. Mind you, I'm not sure they ever promised that Bluetooth file transfer would b... [Read More]
Tracked on January 18, 2005 6:37 AM
Well, the way Verizon and Sprint work, you can't get an "unlocked" phone onto their networks. They have to add your ESN to their database, and there's nothing in it for them...
Posted by: Ian Argent at January 20, 2005 10:42 PM
The Motorolan was wrong to say that, in two ways.
First, Motorola has so far managed to stay on the high road of just providing the platform, not deciding on what restrictions are put on users' rights. This is not Motorola's fight, and if anything they should be expressing views that support the customer.
Second, it is wrong that nobody in the industry has ever said bluetooth would be cost free. It has been said many times, and it has been implied, and it has been assumed, and the assumption has not been corrected by anyone in the industry.
Posted by: Chris at January 19, 2005 8:26 AM
A workaround for you...
Mobile PhoneTools version 3.0
software CD plus USB Cable - 98653H (just in case the link above doesn't work)
It's compatable with the V710 (according to the page, don't have the V710 to try it out on)
It's a data cable and the software to link your phone to a PC. I use it to back up my phone book, keep my calendar up-to-date, pull photos off my phone and put in MP3 files for ringtones. It can do more.
It's a useful but of kit. It's about €65 in Europe (O2). Don't know about US sources...
Posted by: Cork at January 18, 2005 3:19 AM
Funny, I just refused to buy a v710 for this very reason. The phone only has three Blue Tooth profiles. Headset, Car Adapter and Modem. Even then it wouldn't pair with my headset.
Ken
Posted by: Ken at January 17, 2005 9:05 PM
Currently there is a work-around available. You can use the TransFlash card slot to copy ringtones and pictures to and from your phone. Rumor has it that Verizon is disabling TransFlash in the next firmware version.
Posted by: Matthew at January 17, 2005 12:32 PM
There is something customers can do about this: buy unlocked phones.
Posted by: Wes Felter at January 16, 2005 9:42 PM