Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Once Electrocuted, Twice Shy? Power Utilities Not Interested in Being ISP | Main | Getting Secure »
Kevin Werbach discusses his expectations for municipal Wi-Fi: He envisions cities contributing their physical infrastructure such as light poles as well as funding to support coverage in areas where the private companies might not get a return on their investments. Private companies would do the rest. It sounds like Werbach is suggesting that the municipal network wouldn’t be free but would be cheaper than alternative access methods. The networks would also be used by city workers to do their jobs.
There are a couple problems about this discussion over municipal Wi-Fi that aren’t usually addressed. One is that while it’s a great idea for cities to sponsor coverage in low-income areas, the people who live there will need computers to get on the Internet. If those residents currently go to the library or the public school to use a computer, it doesn’t make much sense to cover the whole neighborhood with Wi-Fi. San Francisco’s mayor said that no resident should be without a computer, but his wording doesn’t necessarily suggest that he’s going to try to ensure that every resident has one.
Also, I suspect that if these municipal networks really happen in a significant way, the cellular operators will start raising a stink. Werbach describes competition between the high-cost and reliable 3G networks and the cheaper and less reliable municipal-sponsored Wi-Fi networks. Given the price that the cellular operators have spent to build their networks and to license spectrum from the government, I should think they’d raise hell over a city-sponsored competitor.
Posted by nancyg at October 26, 2004 8:50 AM
Categories: Municipal
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/2669
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Public, Private Partnerships for Municipal Wi-Fi:
» Public, Private Partnerships - a solution for for Municipal Wi-Fi from Lockergnome's Mobile Lifestyle
Right off the bat, public Wi-Fi being offered for free would be great. That is until the city gets the bill, that is. One possible solution is to combine a public/private endeavor to help offset the huge public costs involved... [Read More]
Tracked on October 26, 2004 9:13 PM