Receive new posts as email.
RSS 0.91 | RSS 2.0
RDF | Atom
Podcast only feed (RSS 2.0 format)
Get an RSS reader
Get a Podcast receiver
| Sun | Mon | Tues | Wed | Thurs | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | |
| 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 |
| 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 |
| 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 |
| 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator or JiWire, Inc.
Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2006 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.
Powered by
Movable Type
« Massport Hunts for Logan Contractor | Main | Voice over IP Thrives in Africa, with Adversity »
Sony to offer $600 Wi-Fi fileserver with 20 Gb storage (in German): The folks at Computer Woche (Computer Week) report that Sony should be offering a 20 Gb Wi-Fi fileserver with an optional $60 Ethernet cradle, and the ability to support 250 Wi-Fi users. (That is, the ability to feed out 250 NAT-provided addresses, but not necessarily the networking capacity to handle that.)
Oddly, this is clearly Martian territory: the folks at Martian offer the nearly identically featured NetDrive Wireless for $399 (40 Gb) or $479 (120 Gb) as well as in no-drive kit form ($379). Of course, theirs includes Ethernet in the basic model, and offers Rendezvous-based options for Mac users, including iTunes music sharing.
Full disclosure: Martian has sponsored this site twice. [via Lockergnome]
Posted by Glennf at July 5, 2003 3:40 PM
TrackBack URL for this entry:
https://db.isbn.nu/mt3/mt-tb.pl/476
Yep, this is from five months ago. Here's a link to this from Sony's Japanese site: http://www.sony.jp/products/Consumer/PGX/index.html
Posted by: Peter at July 6, 2003 7:24 PM
I wasn't looking at the date! Rather, picked it up from Lockgernome. Whoops!
Posted by: Glenn Fleishman at July 6, 2003 2:12 PM
Did anyone take a closer look at the date the referenced article was written?
05.02.2003 um 11:00 Uh (meaning February 5th).
I tried getting one (from Sony Japan) for quite some time. Unsuccessfully, of course. So why did you dig out this corpse now?
Posted by: Carlos at July 6, 2003 2:00 PM