Email Delivery

Receive new posts as email.

Email address

Syndicate this site

RSS | Atom

Contact

About This Site
Contact Us
Privacy Policy

Search


November 2010
Sun Mon Tues Wed Thurs Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30        

Stories by Category

Basics :: Basics
Casting :: Casting Listen In Podcasts Videocasts
Culture :: Culture Hacking
Deals :: Deals
FAQ :: FAQ
Future :: Future
Hardware :: Hardware Adapters Appliances Chips Consumer Electronics Gaming Home Entertainment Music Photography Video Gadgets Mesh Monitoring and Testing PDAs Phones Smartphones
Industry :: Industry Conferences Financial Free Health Legal Research Vendor analysis
International :: International
Media :: Media Locally cached Streaming
Metro-Scale Networks :: Metro-Scale Networks Community Networking Municipal
Network Types :: Network Types Broadband Wireless Cellular 2.5G and 3G 4G Power Line Satellite
News :: News Mainstream Media
Politics :: Politics Regulation Sock Puppets
Schedules :: Schedules
Security :: Security 802.1X
Site Specific :: Site Specific Administrative Detail April Fool's Blogging Book review Cluelessness Guest Commentary History Humor Self-Promotion Unique Wee-Fi Who's Hot Today?
Software :: Software Open Source
Spectrum :: Spectrum 60 GHz
Standards :: Standards 802.11a 802.11ac 802.11ad 802.11e 802.11g 802.11n 802.20 Bluetooth MIMO UWB WiGig WiMAX ZigBee
Transportation and Lodging :: Transportation and Lodging Air Travel Aquatic Commuting Hotels Rails
Unclassified :: Unclassified
Vertical Markets :: Vertical Markets Academia Enterprise WLAN Switches Home Hot Spot Aggregators Hot Spot Advertising Road Warrior Roaming Libraries Location Medical Public Safety Residential Rural SOHO Small-Medium Sized Business Universities Utilities wISP
Voice :: Voice

Archives

November 2010 | October 2010 | September 2010 | August 2010 | July 2010 | June 2010 | May 2010 | April 2010 | March 2010 | February 2010 | January 2010 | December 2009 | November 2009 | October 2009 | September 2009 | August 2009 | July 2009 | June 2009 | May 2009 | April 2009 | March 2009 | February 2009 | January 2009 | December 2008 | November 2008 | October 2008 | September 2008 | August 2008 | July 2008 | June 2008 | May 2008 | April 2008 | March 2008 | February 2008 | January 2008 | December 2007 | November 2007 | October 2007 | September 2007 | August 2007 | July 2007 | June 2007 | May 2007 | April 2007 | March 2007 | February 2007 | January 2007 | December 2006 | November 2006 | October 2006 | September 2006 | August 2006 | July 2006 | June 2006 | May 2006 | April 2006 | March 2006 | February 2006 | January 2006 | December 2005 | November 2005 | October 2005 | September 2005 | August 2005 | July 2005 | June 2005 | May 2005 | April 2005 | March 2005 | February 2005 | January 2005 | December 2004 | November 2004 | October 2004 | September 2004 | August 2004 | July 2004 | June 2004 | May 2004 | April 2004 | March 2004 | February 2004 | January 2004 | December 2003 | November 2003 | October 2003 | September 2003 | August 2003 | July 2003 | June 2003 | May 2003 | April 2003 | March 2003 | February 2003 | January 2003 | December 2002 | November 2002 | October 2002 | September 2002 | August 2002 | July 2002 | June 2002 | May 2002 | April 2002 | March 2002 | February 2002 | January 2002 | December 2001 | November 2001 | October 2001 | September 2001 | August 2001 | July 2001 | June 2001 | May 2001 | April 2001 |

Recent Entries

In-Flight Wi-Fi and In-Flight Bombs
Can WPA Protect against Firesheep on Same Network?
Southwest Sets In-Flight Wi-Fi at $5
Eye-Fi Adds a View for Web Access
Firesheep Makes Sidejacking Easy
Wi-Fi Direct Certification Starts
Decaf on the Starbucks Digital Network
Google Did Snag Passwords
WiMax and LTE Not Technically 4G by ITU Standards
AT&T Wi-Fi Connections Keep High Growth with Free Service

Site Philosophy

This site operates as an independent editorial operation. Advertising, sponsorships, and other non-editorial materials represent the opinions and messages of their respective origins, and not of the site operator. Part of the FM Tech advertising network.

Copyright

Entire site and all contents except otherwise noted © Copyright 2001-2010 by Glenn Fleishman. Some images ©2006 Jupiterimages Corporation. All rights reserved. Please contact us for reprint rights. Linking is, of course, free and encouraged.

Powered by
Movable Type

« Hendricks: Licensed Users and Unlicensed's Future | Main | FCC Amends Part 15: More, Better, Cleverer »

May 15, 2002

Evolution of a Case: Darwin Networks

I've heard the name Darwin Networks bandied about as the first of what would be many enforcement actions against operators of wireless Wi-Fi and related networks. The story goes that Darwin was told to shut down a network because Part 97 amateur operators (hams) complained about interference at a Dallas, Texas, apartment complex. As primary and secondary licensed users of various chunks of the 2.4 GHz band -- see yesterday's post and more to come -- hams have the right to cite interference, and the FCC has the right to shut down the interferers.

As I've dug deeper, however, this single case appears much shallower than I originally expected. The bare facts are that a letter was sent February 8, 2001, by Riley Hollingsworth, who, as special counsel to the Enforcement Bureau of the FCC, writes these sorts of letters to violators. Hollingsworth makes numerous appearances at ham gatherings, too, to help inform them of their rights and responsibilities. I have left a message for him to clarify where I can find a copy of this letter officially.

However, searching Google and following up on sources, I found the following interesting facts.

  • The only place the story about Darwin Networks receiving a letter appears at the ARRL (national amateur radio society) site (here) with a dateline of Newington, CT, the HQ of the ARRL. This is not a wire service story, but appears to have been reported in house.
  • Darwin Networks wasn't issued an order, but was sent a cease and desist letter.
  • The issuance of this letter and any other related enforcement action does not appear in the log the FCC offers publicly for 2001 orders. Since this wasn't an order, I believe, I also checked public notices of field actions. I also searched the site and examined other separate databases on the site. No matches for this letter.
  • I have found a copy of the letter typed in on a random site that no longer carries it, but I have referenced the Google cache. Also, his name does not appear on the archives (via The Internet Archive) of the Darwin Web site. A list of press releases that show prominent hirings (CIO, CEO, etc.) fail to list him as well.
  • The only place the CTO of Darwin Networks, Jeff Wellenmeyer, is listed in any form appears to be in articles related to the Hollingsworth letter at the ARRL site. It's odd for a CTO to appear in that limited a fashion in the Internet age.
  • Every other reference to the Darwin Networks letter refers back to the ARRL story.
  • There is no follow-up to the letter either on the ARRL site or elsewhere on the Web.
  • Darwin Networks appears to no longer be in business, but continued in business for several months after the letter was sent. The letter asked for a response in 10 business days. The Internet Archive has a news release from an archived copy of Darwin's site that indicates the company filed for bankruptcy in January 2001, but was in operation at least through April 2001.
  • The attorney cited in the letter, Terry Cavanaugh, is not listed on the current roster of attorneys at the firm noted in the letter and article.

It's possible with the company shut down, the FCC didn't pursue the matter. But there should be a record somewhere of the letter and the individuals involved. Or even the hams who filed the complaint.

If anyone has some specifics: an actual copy of the letter, a news story with primary citations (not quoting the ARRL story verbatim or mentioning that story in passing as a News.com story did), or other information, please contact me. It's ironic that the only and most prominently discussed case of an interference problem between hams and Wi-Fi appears to have no documentation.

Other News for 5/15/2002

David Pogue reviews Bluetooth's state of the art: Pogue's NY Times column is an accurate and astute run-down of the potential and current reality of Bluetooth. I was able to test Palm synching this week, myself, using an m125, the Palm Bluetooth Card for the SD slot, and the D-Link USB Bluetooth Adapter for Mac OS X. It's pretty wonderful when it's all hooked up. He also has a nifty rundown of available Bluetooth add-ons and adapters.

1 Comment

I was a contractor for darwin.
contact me I have a a lot of info!